Blog

Optimizing Lithium Battery Busbar Geometry for Current Density: 7 Key Factors

X
Xiang Bao
Technical Editorial
March 24, 2025
4 min read
Optimizing Lithium Battery Busbar Geometry for Current Density 7 Key Factors
Fig 1. Thermal dissipation pathways in a standard 800V battery module configuration.
debug htmlLen: 18574

Why Busbar Geometry Matters in Lithium Battery Design

Busbars are essential for efficient current distribution in lithium-ion battery packs used in EVs and energy storage systems. Optimizing their geometry (width, length, and thickness) ensures low resistance, minimal heat generation, and maximum safety.

Quick Answer:

To optimize busbar geometry for current density:
Choose the right material – Copper for high conductivity, aluminum for cost savings.
Match width to cell terminals – About ¾ of the terminal width for optimal contact.
Select thickness based on ampacity – Use 1/8” copper for ~150 A, ensuring low resistance.
Consider heat dissipation – Thick busbars reduce heat, while cooling systems may be needed for high-power applications.

This guide breaks down 7 key factors to help engineers, DIY builders, and battery designers create efficient and safe busbar designs.

1. Determining Current Requirements for Busbars

Why It Matters:

The first step in busbar design is defining continuous and short-circuit current requirements. The busbar must handle these currents without excessive heating or voltage drops.

Example Calculation:

Consider a battery pack with 9 cells in series, each 50 Ah with a 3C discharge rate:

  • Continuous Current: 50 Ah × 3C = 150 A
  • Short-Circuit Current: Determined using Ohm’s Law with internal resistance
    • If each cell has 2 mΩ resistance, the total pack resistance (9 cells) is 18 mΩ.
    • With a 32.85V pack voltage, the short-circuit current = 1825 A (32.85V / 0.018Ω).

Design Tip: Busbars should be optimized primarily for continuous current, while safety components (fuses, circuit breakers) handle short-circuit events.


2. Selecting the Right Busbar Material

Copper vs. Aluminum: Pros & Cons

Material Conductivity (% of Copper) Cost Weight Oxidation Resistance Recommended For
Copper 100% Higher Heavier Excellent High-performance EVs, industrial applications
Aluminum ~60% Lower Lighter Requires surface treatment Cost-sensitive designs, lightweight applications

Best Practice:

  • Use copper for high-power applications (EVs, grid storage).
  • Use aluminum for cost savings, but ensure proper terminal connections to avoid galvanic corrosion.


3. Optimizing Busbar Width for Efficient Current Flow

Key Principle:

  • The busbar width should match at least ¾ of the cell terminal width to maximize electrical contact and minimize resistance.

Example Design:

For a ¾” diameter cell terminal, use a ¾” wide busbar for optimal connectivity.

Why It Matters:

  • Too narrow? Increases resistance, leading to heat buildup.
  • Too wide? Adds unnecessary weight and cost.

 

4. Choosing the Right Busbar Thickness Based on Ampacity

Formula for Resistance:

Where:

  • RR = Resistance
  • ρ\rho = Material resistivity
  • ll = Length
  • AA = Cross-sectional area (width × thickness)

Ampacity Chart (Copper, ¾” Wide, 30°C Rise)

Thickness Ampacity (A)
1/16” 145 A
1/8” 215 A

Example Selection:

  • For 150 A continuous current, 1/8” thick copper is recommended (215 A ampacity, leaving a safety margin).
  • If using aluminum, increase thickness by 40% to compensate for lower conductivity.


5. Managing Heat Dissipation to Prevent Overheating

Why It Matters:

  • High current densities generate heat, which reduces efficiency and can cause failure.
  • Poor heat dissipation accelerates battery degradation.

Solutions:

Use thicker busbars to reduce resistance.
Ensure airflow around busbars or add liquid cooling for high-power systems.
Check connection tightness – loose connections increase resistance and heat.


6. Ensuring Secure Mechanical Attachment & Safety Measures

Why It’s Important:

Loose busbars cause:
Higher contact resistance → Increased heat & inefficiency
Potential short circuits → Safety hazards

Best Practices:

Use proper fastening techniques (bolts, compression fittings).
Check tightness regularly – especially in vibrating environments (EVs).
Include fuses/circuit breakers to protect against short-circuit currents.

 

7. Practical Example: Optimized Busbar Design for an 8s2p Battery Pack

Scenario:

  • 8 cells in series, 2 in parallel320 Ah total capacity
  • 150 A continuous current (with 300 A ANL fuse)

Recommended Busbar Design:

Parameter Value
Material Copper
Width ¾” (matches terminal size)
Length 2½” (for proper connection without excess resistance)
Thickness ⅛” (supports 215 A, leaving a margin for 150 A)
Number of Busbars 14 (for all cell connections)


Conclusion: Key Takeaways for Busbar Optimization

🔋 To optimize lithium battery busbars for current density:
Choose copper for best performance, or aluminum for cost savings.
Match busbar width to at least ¾ of cell terminal size.
Use ampacity charts1/8” copper handles ~150 A safely.
Ensure secure attachment to minimize resistance and heat buildup.
Implement thermal management for long-term battery health.